Fairness in job performance ratings, and land rights for women

How rating people’s job performance could be more fair

Simplifying performance ratings can make them more equitable, a study found. Women and employees of color are often given lower marks than their white and male counterparts, which can impact their pay.

In a recent paper by researchers in the U.S. and Canada, more than 70,000 ratings were analyzed from an online platform where customers hire workers for home services. A binary rating of “thumbs-up” or “thumbs-down,” rather than one to five stars, equalized pay and ratings between white and nonwhite workers.

Why We Wrote This

Our progress roundup includes a look at equity in three ways: the fairness of grading job performance, the worthiness of women as landowners, and the focus on the needs of Brazil’s Indigenous people to improve their quality of life.

In work by other researchers, when professors were graded on a scale of 1 to 10, raters hesitated to give women the highest marks, which the study said was possibly because subjective traits such as “perfection” are more readily ascribed to men. Yet the gap disappeared when professors were rated on a scale of 1 to 6.

Source link

Related Posts

No Content Available